I am following the posts by Mairin , John and Alex who, correctly, question the direction of Fedora.
On my side, having been in the Suse, Debian, Gentoo, and Ubuntu side of things in last eight years, and having landed in Fedora (and staying there..) for the past four, I can say I am mostly happy with the distro. And yes, I run it as my primary desktop, and, yes again, I do not dual boot.
Regarding updates, I regard Fedora as a living on the edge distribution, where experimentations are done and new software is built. The new startup daemon being ported to Fedora 14 is a primary sample of this. And this is the advantage of Fedora over, say, Ubuntu. Ubuntu has the momentum, the buzz, a company beyond – all of this, but has also critical issues in upstream contribution (Gnome comes to mind), innovation, and also patching.
What can be done? Innovation is the holy grail of Fedora, and that should stay. Perhaps, instead of following a 6 months release cycle, we could take a more progressive approach – an 8 month release cycle? Some LTS releases? Open to suggestions.
Luca Botti at LinkedIn